Monday, July 8, 2013

POLARIZATION-Evil Blight on the Land or Blight On An Evil Land

PLATITUDE: A remark or statement, one with a moral content that has been used too often to be interesting or thoughtful.
There is no middle ground anymore, no one is a centralist(centrist), everyone is an extremist.
I will never understand how a poor person can vote Republican.
Republicans represent rich old money. Shoot, money in general. Republican policy rarely supports the lower or middle class. It's not opinion, its fact.
These are some quotes pulled from a series of post by some of my Facebook friends this afternoon.
This sharing of opinions in the modern day equivalent of the town square, was engendered by an earnest young woman who complained in a status that-
This polarization of politics--- liberal v conservative, republican v democrat--- is what is wrong with America.
POLARIZATION:  the act of making the differences between groups or ideas ever more clear-cut and extreme, hardening the opposition between them.
In my opinion, politics in America today, is dominated by the competition of ideologies.  Like-minded people band together in political parties to advance their agendas, which they believe will best serve their state or nation.  Competition with other groups, who don't agree with said agenda, results in political discourse.
 During this discourse if - the differences between groups or ideas become ever more clear cut- it is democracy in action. This is a good thing.
 If it causes - hardening of the opposition between them - it is not bad, and not necessarily good, but to paraphrase Shakespeare, 
 “IT IS, WHAT IT IS.” lol
What is wrong with America today is the way this discourse takes place!
In sound bites and shouting matches, and in thirty second ads and bumper sticker platitudes.

Liberal and conservative are political philosophies, and Republican and Democrat are political parties; they are not interchangeable terms.

Sometimes people with no philosophy do not understand people who have one, and resort to denigration rather than debate.

Sunday, May 12, 2013

President Ronald Reagan
Days in Office: 2,922
THE DEBT WENT UP BUT THE ECONOMY WENT UP MORE
Jan. 20, 1981-debt- $934,073,000,000 –GDP-$2,659,400,000,000
Jan. 20, 1989-debt- $2,697,957, 000,000-GDP-$5,581,700,000,000
GDP INCREASE-$2,883,743,000,000
FOR YOU DEMOCRATS-THAT MEANS THE ECONOMY MORE THAN DOUBLED
Total federal revenues doubled from just over $517 billion in 1980 to more than $1 trillion in 1990.
Revenues from individual income taxes climbed from just over $244 billion in 1980 to nearly $467 billion in 1990.
During Reagan’s two terms unemployment dropped to under 5%, as the economy created over 19 million new jobs. Meanwhile, revenues to the Treasury doubled during his two terms, due to the tremendous economic growth. By this point in 1984, the Reagan economy was adding 360,000 jobs per month with a population of 85 million less than today.
The 4 million jobs Obama likes to brag about adding since he took office, Reagan’s economy added in the year 1984 alone

Friday, April 29, 2011

SO WHATS A FEW MILLION DEAD RUSSIANS BETWEEN COMRADES?



When I googled What’s the Matter With Kansas, the first thing I noticed in the Wikipedia entry was the authors complaint that Kansas was no longer the “hotbed” of populism it once was.
In the late 19th century, Kansas was known as a hotbed of the left-wing Populist movement, but in recent decades, it has become overwhelmingly conservative.
 I would suggest there is good a reason, the good people of Kansas rejected the left wing ideology the author laments.
In the 20th century the extermination of tens of millions of people by the USSR was revealed to people who were paying attention. As a result any political philosophy, in any way aligned with Communists (which the populists of the day were) was out of favor.
 "How long will you keep killing people?" asked Lady Astor of Stalin in 1931.
Replied Stalin, "the process would continue as long as was necessary" to establish a communist society.

Probably 61,911,000 people, 54,769,000 of them citizens, have been murdered by the Communist Party--the government--of the Soviet Union


    * 1923-29: 2,200,000
    * 1929-39: 15,785,000
    * 1939-45: 18,157,000
    * 1946-54: 15,613,000  
  
The New York Times did its best to hide this from the American people.

Walter Duranty (1884-1957) was a correspondent for the New York Times who violated the public trust by sending pro-Soviet stories home, pretending that all was well even as Russia starved 6 million Ukrainians to death. Bewilderingly, he was awarded a Pulitzer Prize for telling these lies.

 Duranty is known for being a Stalinist sympathizer, Soviet propagandist, and blatant liar. Duranty's reports stated that the Soviets were ruling in the best interest of the people. He referred to Stalin as "the greatest living statesman". Stalin himself told Duranty "You have done a good job in your reporting of the USSR"[2] Even though Duranty was criticized initially, it was not until 1980 that the Times publicly acknowledged his failure.

This is the type of thing that makes me wonder if anyone should trust the Times as it goes out of its way to disparage anyone associated with the Tea Party.